• MotoAsh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They got their user base by being the first ones to have open access to it. Being the first to market OFC gives a massive advantage.

    You are also using flawed logic. This isn’t AI vs everything. This is ONLY the “AI” products compared to themselves. These same exact numbers could happen with 1000 users across the entire world, yet you claim it’s evidence of general public acceptance.

    Flawed logic is bad logic. ChatGPT also sells their services to other corporations, where several of the others are end-user only, so again, you are using flawed logic to pretend like everyone actually wants this horseshit.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They got their user base by being the first ones to have open access to it. Being the first to market OFC gives a massive advantage.

      Right, and then everyone chose to go use them.

      This isn’t AI vs everything. This is ONLY the “AI” products compared to themselves

      Every single one of them showed an increase in user growth, Microsoft just didn’t grow as much as the others. They’re not just shuffling the same users around, they’re continuing to gain new ones.

      And as I pointed out in another response to you, chatgpt.com is the fourth-most-visited website in the world. They’re doing that with just a thousand users?